Turning RBI Cybersecurity Requirements into a Testable Assurance Programme
A regulated financial institution connected security-testing scope, remediation evidence and management reporting to its applicable RBI cybersecurity obligations.
Client: Regulated Financial Institution
The challenge
The Audit Report Existed. Evidence of Ongoing Risk Closure Was Fragmented.
Security assessments were being conducted, but their scope, findings and closure status were maintained across different teams and reporting processes. As the organisation reviewed its obligations under the applicable RBI cybersecurity directions, it needed a clearer way to demonstrate not just that testing had occurred, but what had been covered, what had been found and whether the resulting risks had been addressed.
- Testing schedules were maintained separately from the current inventory of critical systems.
- Cloud and application changes were not consistently reflected in assessment scope.
- Remediation updates lacked a common evidentiary standard.
- Management reporting showed open and closed findings without consistently explaining the underlying residual risk.
The solution
Map Every Relevant Obligation to Scope, Testing and Closure Evidence
Security Brigade helped structure a risk-based assurance workflow around the RBI directions applicable to the institution's regulatory category. The work linked regulatory obligations to identified systems, assessment activities, findings, remediation ownership and verification records.
Our approach
- 01Establish the applicable regulatory instrument and map relevant security-assurance obligations to internal controls.
- 02Reconcile testing scope against critical systems, customer-facing services, cloud assets and significant technology changes.
- 03Perform targeted assessments and document coverage, technical findings, limitations and remediation priorities.
- 04Consolidate closure evidence and retest outcomes into a reporting structure suitable for security leadership and relevant governance committees.
The results
From a Collection of Audit Reports to Traceable Security Assurance
The composite engagement demonstrates a more useful outcome than a compliance checklist: each significant observation can be followed from the applicable requirement to the affected system, remediation owner, corrective action and verification result. This gives management a clearer picture of unresolved exposure and strengthens the institution's evidence for subsequent reviews.
Ready to discuss your security needs?
Talk to our team about a similar engagement for your organisation.
Request a scoping call